RSS

FRED VARGAS. The Chalk Circle Man (1996).

05 Sep

The actual story in this novel—a variation on the classic serial murder case—comes swaddled in layers of narrative whimsy, psychological exegesis, and self-consciously fine writing. That’s both good and not so good. By deploying a high literary style that is alternately playful and serious, Vargas is able to work imaginative inflections on some now-standard tropes: a villain who seems to be following the dictates of a strange inner compulsion, a string of apparently disparate killings that may serve to hide the motive for one particular killing, an investigation that uses the tools of psychology to tease out the villain’s homicidal logic, a slow-building aura of suspense that arises from waiting for the next move in a campaign of terror. Vargas, in short, knows her way around the tradition of serial-killer fiction that originates in cornerstone works such as The ABC Murders, by Agatha Christie, and Cat of Many Tails, by Ellery Queen. In striving to invest that tradition with a measure of sophistication, however, she runs the risk of obscuring the contours of her plot.

By and large, the plot conforms to type. All over Paris, in arrondissements far and wide, a faceless city dweller is choosing to make his mark in a most unusual fashion. In the early morning hours, before the Métro closes for the night, he (as the title indicates, and as an eyewitness vouchsafes, it is indeed a man) stops at a patch of ancient pavement and draws a neat circle in blue chalk around an ostensibly random found object. The list of encircled objects steadily grows—an orange, a piece of wire, a candle, and so on—but no pattern emerges to explain why the man has chosen these bits of flotsam and jetsam from the churning urban sea. ChalkCircleMan.jpg Then, one morning, it’s the body of a murdered woman that turns up inside a freshly sketched perimeter of chalk. Then a second corpse gets the chalk-circle treatment, and then a third. All three victims have had their throat slit. Otherwise, as far as the police can determine, there is no connection between them, and likewise there is no discernible motive for anyone to end any of their lives. Until fairly late in the novel, the only apparent method to all of this madness pertains to the geography of the Chalk Circle Man’s activity: Much of that activity clusters in either the Saint-Georges and Pigalle neighborhoods on the Right Bank or the Panthéon and Montparnasse areas on the Left Bank.

Jean-Baptiste Adamsberg, newly installed as commissaire of the 5th Arrondissement after spending his early life in the provinces, is just the man to solve this quintessentially Parisian crime spree. He’s a homely and unkempt fellow, and Vargas plays up his status as naïve rustic among jaded cosmopolitans. She calls him a “wild child” and celebrates him as a creature of pre- or post-rational intellect. His attunement to the subliminal vibrations that connect people with their destinies, she contends, has enabled him leap over his more plodding colleagues in the French gendarmerie. The puzzle on which Adamsberg works his magic contains a few smart twists, and while some readers may guess the correct solution to that puzzle, few of them will be able to deduce it. Vargas drops a fair number of clues along the way, but they are thin and brittle—like the fallen leaves that Adamsberg pauses to contemplate as the case winds to a finish.

The novel, the first in a series about Adamsberg and his retinue, is very much a late-modern work—and very much a French work. Vargas adopts a highly conceptual approach to what remains, at its structural core, a police procedural of the sort that Ed McBain might have written about the cops of the 87th Precinct. Although Adamsberg comes across as a taciturn and down-to-earth fellow, his creator lades her depiction of him with rambling theoretical discussions of his version of police procedure. The Chalk Circle Man contains some detection, but far more abundant in its pages are instances of meta-detection: Both the author and her principal characters chatter quite a lot about what it’s like, and what it means, to be a detective. Vargas’s emphasis on her hero’s intuitive faculties is another aspect of the tale that has an honorable French lineage. Adamsberg, like his illustrious fictional predecessor Inspector Maigret, is an inscrutable genius par excellence, and Vargas evokes the special qualities of Adamsberg’s mind with brio as well as brilliance. Yet she writes about those qualities at such wearying length that one longs for the crisp, exacting technique that Georges Simenon uses to summon Maigret into being.

 

 
4 Comments

Posted by on September 5, 2019 in International, Novel, Puzzle

 

4 responses to “FRED VARGAS. The Chalk Circle Man (1996).

  1. realthog

    September 5, 2019 at 5:10 PM

    I share absolutely your reservations about this novel. It was my introduction to Vargas, and as a result of reading it I avoided her work for some years: it seemed little more than self-indulgent twaddle. I’ve more recently given her work another try and found it more rewarding; it may be a wee while, though, before I trust her enough to explore further.

     
    • Mike

      September 6, 2019 at 5:37 AM

      Thanks for the comment, John. I started reading this novel while I was visiting Paris, and being able to stroll around some of sites that Vargas uses added to my enjoyment of her tale. But the way she told the tale, and especially the way she treated her detective hero, wore thin after a time.

       
  2. J F Norris

    September 6, 2019 at 12:01 PM

    I loved it. And I have enjoyed all of Vargas’ books. I wrote up one of my favorites on the blog — AN UNCERTAIN DEATH, which opens with the discovery of 18 pairs of shoes with the corpses’ feet still inside them lined up neatly outside Highgate Cemetery. I see her as an iconoclast in the genre. She has an awful lot in common with the work of Harry Stephen Keeler in her contemporary spin on what he called webwork plotting — the seemingly random events that occur in a convoluted plot which all prove to have an insidious connection to one another. She’s certainly not to everyone’s taste. I have read multiple critical reviews (both pro and amateur) castigating Vargas for all the things that I find so riveting and original in her books. To each his own. One cannot dismiss the complex and invigorating depths of her strange imagination. For me that alone is worth plunging into her weird mystery novels.

     
    • Mike

      September 7, 2019 at 9:30 AM

      John, I definitely appreciate your enthusiasm! Because I’ve never read Keeler, I’ve always been a little unclear on what the term “webwork plot” means. Now I know. In any event, I have no problem with Vargas’s approach to plotting. I liked that aspect of this book. What I didn’t like so much was all of the highly mannered business that Vargas lays on top of the plot. In particular, I think, she falls into the now very common habit of doting on her main character to excess.

       

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: